Study: Methane emissions from oil and gas wells higher than previous estimates
Marie Donlon | January 21, 2021Researchers from Canada’s McGill University have determined that methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas (AOG) wells are higher than previously thought — by as much as 150% and 20% in Canada and the U.S., respectively.
Citing a lack of information about methane gas quantities emitting from AOG wells and the total number of existing AOG wells (capped or uncapped) and their locations, McGill researchers believe overall methane emissions are underestimated, as is the environmental impact of those methane emissions. Because drilling dates back to the 1850s in both the U.S. and Canada, records of former drill sites in particular are hard to find. As such the methane emissions from such AOGs may go unmeasured,
Bubbles of methane gas in water around an unplugged oil and gas well in Pennsylvania. Source: Mary Kang
To locate such AOGs, the McGill team examined data from 47 provincial, state and territorial databases, research articles and national drilled and active well repositories in the U.S. and Canada.
Of the 4 million AOGs estimated to exist in the U.S., the McGill team determined that 500,000 of those AOGs were undocumented. Similarly, records in Canada, which only date back to 1955, revealed that of the estimated 370,000 AOG wells in Canada, roughly 60,000 were missing from the country’s databases.
To determine how much methane was emitting from the wells, the team examined roughly 600 direct measurements of methane emissions culled from existing studies focused on the AOG wells in Ohio, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, West Virginia and Pennsylvania and wells in Canada’s British Columbia and New Brunswick. The researchers devised assorted scenarios to account for the different levels of annual methane emissions to the wells, based on the “plugging” status of the wells along with whether the wells were oil or gas.
“We see that methane emissions from abandoned wells can vary regionally, highlighting the importance of gathering measurements from Texas and Alberta which have the highest percentage of wells in the U.S. and Canada and no prior measurements,” explained James P. Williams, a study author and Ph.D. student in the Department of Civil Engineering at McGill.
According to the McGill team, the assorted scenarios demonstrated that the annual methane gas emissions from U.S. AOG wells were roughly one-fifth higher than previous U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates. Meanwhile, the team determined that in Canada, AOG well emissions were roughly three times higher than previous estimates from the Environment and Climate Change Canada.
The study, “Methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Canada and the US” appears in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.
What percentage just leaks out of the ground naturally? Or from swamps? Or from animals? Pardon me.
In reply to #1
... or, from the ocean floor? ...
In reply to #2
Big omission on my part. Thank you.
In reply to #3
...juss tryin' ta hepp...
In reply to #1
I worked on an exploration drilling rig in the early 80s in SW Western Australia and the water bores in the area had a lot of methane seeping up in them. .
Some of the water points looked like soda water with the gas in the bore water.
We had not even started to drill but when we did we found the ground was so fractured naturally that it was like a leaky sponge for the gas.
Still you could light up the top of the water fill points. Shame the farmers couldn't capture the gas and put it to good use but then the Gov wouldn't get their cut for doing nothing but paper shuffling.
In reply to #4
''Paper shufflers'' are the same the world over. They stay place long enough to retire, by doing nothing other than what (higher authority) tells them...
In reply to #4
Yeah, I know. I look at all the oil field flares and think of the wasted energy. But oftentimes, the costs of capturing it, transporting it, and processing it, exceeds the value of the product. Otherwise people would be making money off of it.
I don't know anybody who would walk past a $20 bill laying on the ground.
Sour gas is one of the challenges of using the raw natural gas in the field. If there were sour gas tolerant generators, we could feed some power back into the grid to help power pumps and other equipment out there in the oil field. But again, there's that pesky capital cost, maintenance costs, and that ROI thing again.
Otherwise you need a lot of pipelines to get that gas back to a processing plant to get rid of the hydrogen sulfide. And pipelines don't seem to be very popular these days. Especially if your name is Keystone. I'm sad to say our current president is a complete idiot. He is a party puppet. Nothing more than an empty suit. Funny thing is that if people truly understood how much petroleum is actually delivered by pipeline, they might take a different view of them. Pipelines are much safer, more reliable, and cheaper than truck or rail.
But, I'll quit my crazy talk lest I'll be hunted down as one of those radicalized, extremist, insurrectionist domestic terrorist.