Simple At-Home Test Could Detect Early Cognitive Decline
S. Himmelstein | June 23, 2018An international research team has developed a new way to screen for age-related cognitive decline at home. The simple, cost-effective approach uses a test that asks people to detect sounds and flashes on their laptop or phone.
The test may be used to improve early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and provide interventions as early as possible. MCI can develop into Alzheimer’s disease in 30 to 50 percent of people.
There are currently no diagnostic blood tests such as those for diabetes for MCI. The existing diagnosis involves lengthy neuropsychological assessments with tests of cognitive control and memory, along with questions about daily activities and mood. These costly tests require training, often take a lot of patient and clinician time, and can be impacted by factors such as the individual’s IQ, socio-economic status and even the testers themselves. As a result, with an aging global population, and around 50 million people estimated to be living with dementia worldwide, there is an urgent need for such a test.
During a trial, 123 participants were asked to press a button whenever they saw a flash of light or heard a sound. At times, the flashes or sounds were presented alone, and at other times the two appeared simultaneously. The participants included 51 healthy young adults, 49 healthy older adults and 23 older MCI adults.
The researchers then extracted two measures about each person’s performance: 1) whether they were faster at detecting flashes or sound, and 2) the extent to which they benefited from detecting an auditory-visual event versus either flashes or sounds. By using just these two measures, the team could accurately tell if a person was diagnosed with MCI using standard clinical tests.
The results help clarify the link between vision and hearing and their role in supporting memory function. New ways are now sought to validate the screening tool.
Scientists from University of Lausanne (Switzerland), Vanderbilt University, University of Westminster (U.K.), University of London (U.K.) and the University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland contributed to this research, which is published in Scientific Reports.
Mean reaction times (standard error of the mean indicated) of the three groups on the multisensory detection task. (HY = healthy young, HO = healthy older, MCI = mild cognitive impairment). Source: Scientific Reports
Simple at home test for cognitive decline is common knowledge and widely practiced...
..."Where are my keys???"
The mentally impaired individuals were faster than the healthy, what does this prove? A few milliseconds one way or the other is pretty thin evidence of anything....
..."The average (median) reaction time is 215 milliseconds"...
https://www.humanben chmark.com/tests/rea ctiontime/
In reply to #2
...You scored 317.0. You're currently in the top 33 percentile for this test!...
In reply to #3
...You scored 282.0. You're currently in the top 50 percentile for this test!"...
Huh?
In reply to #2
"...The mentally impaired individuals were faster than the healthy, what does this prove?..."
It probably doesn't diffinitively prove anything. It does suggest.
It suggests delay in response is not a good reason to be suspicious of the quality of the response.
It suggests at out best we have an excess of processing power available and may commonly 'overthink' even the most simple tasks.
It could betray a teeming multitude of diverse impulses each competing for enough conscious attention to become The thought/action.
It might add support for the model of the brain where functioning regions actively attempt to dumb down other adjacent areas, (kind of like how plants grow their tallest parts fastest) so that the remaining undamaged parts are at an advantage in some respects.
It probably points to a bias which conflates 'quick' with 'smart' that is probably widespread.
In reply to #5
No, not buying it.....reaction time declines with age, and mentally impaired slows even more...it's not rocket science...These figures are highly suspect....
https://www.ncbi.nlm .nih.gov/pmc/article s/PMC2586814/
In reply to #6
Okay. The answers can still be valid.
In reply to #7
..."You scored 262.0. You're currently in the top 64 percentile for this test!"...
I'm getting faster, I must be turning senile as we speak.....
In reply to #8
Well, I guess you could be right, perhaps they have it exactly backwards...Could your improving score then indicate that as you age you are losing more and more of all the senility with which you were born?
In reply to #6
That's an interesting study.
On a side note, the demographics of the participants makes me curious about selection...
"... The 3616 respondents in the final sample ranged from 32 to 85 years with a mean age of 55.06 years (SD=12.06). Data are grouped into 5 age groups: G1 (32–44, N= 806); G2 (45–54, N=1019); G3 (55–64, N= 939); G4 (65–74, N=589); G5 (75–85, N= 263). Women comprised 53.7% of the sample. There were 40.5% with a four-year college degree or higher, and the average self-rated health on a five-point scale was 3.67 (SD=.96). Because the sample included 369 twins ..."
More than 10% twins?!? Before 1980 the birthrate for twins was less than 2%. The researchers did run the numbers with twins and siblings removed and there wasn't much difference, but it still makes me wonder about how similar and possibly nonrepresentative of typical the sample might be.
In reply to #10
This lot may have been from a group registered to be available to participate in cognitive testing in a general sense...twins are always in demand for testing , similar genetic traits and all....
In reply to #11
Does demand affect nonremunerated supply significantly for something like this?