Turning off the lights can save lives
Peter Brown | March 21, 2019
Turning off lights and saving energy will reduce air pollution resulting in fewer deaths. Source: UW-Madison
While swapping old appliances for energy-efficient ones and turning off the lights can save consumers money, it could also help alleviate health effects attributed to air pollution.
Researchers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison have released a new study that suggests turning lights off saves lives and money due to reduced energy consumption.
“By saving electricity, we can also save lives,” said David Abel professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences at UW–Madison’s Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies. “There is a range of health benefits. It’s a bonus. We find there are extra health reasons to turn off a light.”
Over the span of three summer months, researchers deployed a suite of three widely used models to calculate power plant emissions, air quality and human mortality. The findings show that a 12% increase in summertime energy efficiency would reduce exposure to air pollution, specifically ozone and fine particulate matter.
To put it another way, cleaner air would save 475 human lives each year in the U.S. and almost five cents per kilowatt hour of energy used.
Air pollution from ozone and fine particles caused by emissions are known to adversely affect human health, increasing the risk of asthma attacks and other respiratory diseases.
The goal of the research is to help build bridges between researchers and policymakers. Generally the people who focus on air pollution and those focused on energy work and live in different worlds. Much-needed common threads and tools to integrate the two groups could help save money, improve human health and equip government and industry to meet air quality goals.
Can anyone tell me what a 12% increase in (summertime) efficiency means?
I was always of the understanding that Efficiency = Energy Out / Energy In
If this is supposed to mean that the electrical energy consumption is reduced by 12%, that's a number I can understand.
Seems obviously intuitive. Less used, less generation, lower cost and less pollution. Why did it take a study to come to this obvious conclusion? How much difference is it making with LED lighting? How much difference are energy star appliances making? I use both but my electric bill doesn't seem to go down!
something doesn’t seem to fit - reducing use of lights will reduce my overall electricity cost by 5c/kwh?
my local cost is 10c/kwh.... so if i turn off some lights i’ll cut my bill in half? my house is almost exclusively LED lighting.
clearly this presumption is flawed; some info on the raw data and how this was determined would be helpful.
Not to be morbid, but how much more energy and emissions will result with 475 saved lives? Was this also considered in the analysis?