Industry 4.0 describes the fourth industrial revolution. This is characterized by the integration of digital technologies, automation, and data interchange in manufacturing. It leverages the internet of things (IoT), artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML), robotics, big data, cloud computing and cyber-physical systems (CPL) to create smart factories where machines and systems can communicate, analyze data and make agile decisions independently.

It transforms manufacturing into adaptive operations, with distributed intelligence and decision making.

Source: ipopba/Adobe Stock

Early on, Industry 4.0 was surrounded by considerable optimistic hype, with expectations that it would rapidly revolutionize industries.

As companies began implementing these technologies, they encountered unforeseen complexities that were not described in the philosophical principles of Industry 4.0. Out of early enthusiasm, a gradualist approach has developed.

Look back a decade and the hype machine rightly had us believe we were on the edge of an industrial revolution as dramatic and impact-laden as the first one.

What are Industry 4.0’s foundations?

Industry 4.0 didn’t spring from nowhere. It is just the next phase in a sequence of revolutions that spans thousands of years of human technological development. The start points of ages are only clear in hindsight; this one is no exception.

The first industrial revolution (Industry 1.0) was of course wrought-iron, coal and steam, kicking-off in the 1760s. But this really built out the promise of the Bronze Age (~3300 BCE) and the Iron Age (~1200 BCE).

Industry 2.0 was electricity, oil/gasoline, steel and precision, commencing circa 1870, heralded by amazing innovations like the Vaucanson lathe in 1741 (the machine that made everything).

Industry 3.0 is messier to define; it could be the fissile age or electronics; call its initiation 1895 (Röntgen’s, X-rays), 1898 (Curie's, Radium), 1904 (Flemming, valve diode), 1942 (the Chicago Pile), 1945 (Manhattan project), 1947 (the transistor), or 1973 (Micra-N, the first PC).

Why we are where we are

Industry 4.0 got off to a soft start somewhere between the Jacquard loom (1805, the first punch card machine) and the IoT (coined by Kevin Ashton, 1999) and the first programmable logic controller (Morley, 1968).

Industry 4.0 was only identified in 2011 at the Hanover Fair.

So, Industry 4.0 is just the next step in a 5,000 year progression and it's having a fuzzy start. The hype machine was right about the principle but overheated about the schedule.

The future has arrived — it’s just not evenly distributed.

Naming rights

The other revolutions were hard material based, but the understanding of the great trajectory is now more nuanced. No industrial revolution was a single event and none can be properly described without some iteration and bedding-in.

Software has defined sequenced development, so nobody goes to market with Release 1.0. Release 1.0 to release 1.09 tend to be dev stages, before there’s a public BETA.

The pace of adoption is also slower than the pace of innovation, so the core principles underlying Industry 4.0 are changing. For those of us in the vanguard, the sector has evolved far beyond the original concept.

The fourth industrial revolution is fast approaching BETA — but it's not there yet. We are naming it, Industry 4.05 is upon us, and there’s a way to go before general release. Five sub-revolutions of reimagining have altered the plan.

But let's not understate the achievements. We’re making a note here! Huge success!

The steps beyond 4.0

Industry 4.0 was defined at the outset as having a focus on the digitization of manufacturing through cyber-physical systems, IoT and smart factories. That wasn’t the whole story.

Human-centric approach: Collaboration between humans and machines seeks to integrate robotics and AI to complement human skills rather than render them redundant. The focus is on enhancing human creativity.

Predictive maintenance and smart supply chains: Advanced AI algorithms analyze vast data from machines to learn system behaviors and predict failures before they occur. Machine learning optimizes supply chain operations by predicting demand, optimizing logistics and managing inventory.

Edge computing and 5G: These allow data to be processed closer to the source, reducing latency and improving real-time decision-making. 5G networks enhance the ability of devices to communicate rapidly and reliably and work faster and more smoothly at their edges.

Digital twins: This exploits digital replicas of physical assets, to simulate, monitor and optimize performance in real-time. Digital twins serve for everything from product development to predictive maintenance and dynamic system modeling at scale.

Quantum computing: Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize Industry 4.0 by solving complex optimization problems much faster than traditional computers.

These clusters of developments represent divergence from and greater sophistication developing within the initial Industry 4.0 framework, for a human-centric and sustainable approach to industrial innovation.

The challenges

Much like any other technology development, there are the early adopters, the followers, the reluctant drag-alongs and the resistant rump that sees itself doing ok and sees no pressing reason to change.

What are the challenges?

Capital investment

The cost of implementation presents a significant barrier to Industry 4.0 adoption. High initial investments extend beyond equipment to include costs for integrating new systems with existing infrastructure and training employees.

Technology refinements induce rapid obsolescence, rendering last year's solution a little prehistoric. This impedes the widespread implementation of digital transformation, limiting the potential benefits to patches.

Continuous economic disruption and future-concern is a serious obstacle to aggressive investment in Industry 4.0 adoption.

High initial costs for implementation arise from new equipment, integration and training. Companies will typically prioritize short-term financial stability over long-term innovation.

The skills gap

The profound skills gaps are a barrier to Industry 4.0 adoption, requiring a generational shift that will not be answered quickly. Thought leaders and driven individuals keep up/ahead — a 1% headcount. Further, the rapid pace of technological evolution makes it challenging to stay current.

This gap is particularly pronounced in industries that have traditionally relied on, and still see a path to profit from less optimized processes, so rollout is a sluggish process in many industries.

Integration issues

Legacy system integration poses a significant barrier to Industry 4.0 adoption. Many companies operate adequately with sub-optimal machinery, software and infrastructure that simply cannot participate in an Industry 4.0 transformation. Integrating these legacy systems is typically complex, costly and time-consuming.

The intrinsic absence of standardization and interoperability between systems often requires custom solutions, leading to unplanned integration delays and expenses.

New technology interoperability presents an often insuperable barrier to Industry 4.0 adoption. As companies implement various advanced technologies, ensuring seamless communication and integration between them is an ongoing challenge, while there is no common SOP for Industry 4.0.

Technologies often originate from diverse vendors, each with its own protocols/OS, standards, and data formats, leading to deep rooted interface/comms issues. Without a standardized framework, diverse systems can be unable to cooperate.

Typically, interoperability challenges result in data silos, inefficiencies and disrupted performance, preventing the effective realization of the benefits of Industry 4.0. Middleware solutions become the only way forward, and these are too often unique and themselves a challenge.

Organizational culture

Inertia is a key barrier to Industry 4.0 adoption. Employees and management are often hesitant to embrace new technologies due to fear of job displacement, unfamiliarity with digital tools, cost implications, comfort with existing processes, or all of the above.

Evolving understanding is teaching us that human machine cooperation is the most workable model — not the expected new leisure, but combined action by people and cobots is the softer, more viable and more flexible approach to the revolution.

It is this step, perhaps more than all the others combined, that is the defining characteristic of the change from 4.0 to 4.05 - the recognition that, however machine-ly it may be, the delivery of the fourth industrial revolution still revolves around the people who are making it reality.

Dragging Industry 4.0(+) toward the light

Many steps of physical and mental change are required to engineer the outcome toward its potential.

Business is bloody and wasteful, at its best

It’s the nature of the evolution of the business environment that established companies have huge inertia, and typically resist the new, in favor of the safe. It falls to the rising stars, innovation pockets within enterprises, and the disruptors to implement change and execute on the potential in new technologies.

History tells that the German and Japanese economic miracles that arose from the ashes of the wars of the 20th Century originated with the destruction of the economies of both. The U.K., a notional ‘winner’ was able to relax into the complacency of the victor and continue in slow decline. The ‘losers’ had no choice but to rebuild — and rebuilding from a blank page rarely encourages backward looking methodological and technology approaches.

Fresh shoots arise out of the fire.

Value-driven vs cost savings

Industry 4.0 emphasizes creating value through innovation, enhanced customer experiences and operational efficiencies. Companies must risk investment in technologies that offer long-term benefits, such as increased agility, improved product quality and faster time-to-market, rather than just immediate cost reductions. This requires a mindset change, where businesses prioritize strategic growth, customer satisfaction and sustainability over short-term savings.

This mindset is, to a variable degree, anathema to successful companies, who endure great commercial pressures to focus on stability and continuity. When those pressures are overcome, it is typically as a result of difficulties that reignite the startup-fires.

New approaches to cooperative working with machinery

Collaborative approaches to environment building are baked into the evolution of the Industry 4.0 concept — despite being absent from its foundational moments. Altering the functional agent definition from robots to cobots represents a new approach, where skilled people interact with, integrate with and rely upon machinery — but remain at the heart of the manufacturing process.

Unlike traditional robots, cobots are designed to work alongside humans, enhancing productivity while maintaining safety. Integrating cobots into the workplace requires rethinking workflows and ensuring seamless human-machine collaboration, resulting in workspaces that accommodate both human workers and robotic counterparts.

Solutions to cultural barriers

Implementation of staged Industry 4.0 rollouts requires organizations to address cultural challenges arising from the tendency to low levels of forward impact-assessment, conservatism, fear, complacency and more. This demands the fostering of a culture of continuous learning, where employees are encouraged to, and rewarded for, upskill and adaptation to new approaches.

Change management is the critical driver of this, and it can only work when the leadership is convinced of the value proposition and the management and shareholders in an enterprise are united in the intent. Staff must be involved in both defining and executing the transition process to reduce resistance, build acceptance and prevent loss of momentum at the hard-edge.

Leadership must promote, recruit for and reward a culture of innovation, where experimentation and the active embracing of new ideas are main-streamed — without allowing a revolution-at-any-costs mindset to outpace practicality and the focus on profitability and cultural shift.

Machinery interoperability and integration solutions/ideas

Achieving machinery interoperability and integration lies at the heart of an Industry 4.0 implementation. This is predicated upon the adoption of standardized communication protocols, such as Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture (OPCUA), equipping machines from divergent manufacturers to communicate seamlessly.

Implementing IoT platforms that coherently aggregate data from all equipment and systems into a unified dashboard is the only route to consistent, self-checking visibility and decision-making. Companies can only deliver on this promise by investing in middleware solutions that bridge the gap between legacy systems and new Industry 4.0 technologies, aiming for a low-friction transition that minimizes disruption.

Data-driven decision making

Implementing advanced data analytics and AI to process the data generated lies at the heart of Industry 4.0. This enables predictive maintenance, real-time optimization/correction and actively informed, real-time decision-making.

The creation of digital twins of systems and physical assets facilitates the simulation and analysis of real-world performance in a virtual environment. This equips operations for better planning, predictive maintenance and process optimization prior to implementation of changes in the real.

Regulatory and standards alignment

Keeping both the team and the systems adaptive to evolving regulations and industry standards will improve the reliability and function of an Industry 4.0 environment. Teams that actively engage in industry groups and standardization bodies can help to shape and align with standards as they develop, leading the way for the less proactive and reducing the surprises downstream.

Conclusion

The fourth industrial revolution is a juggernaut that is slowly and non-uniformly gathering momentum. And it's a concept that is evolving rapidly as it crystallizes into reality.

The most effective transformations in most fields are the ones that happen organically in active response to real stimuli. And then, surprise! they're done before we notice.

Of course, that also means the revolution is quite non-uniform. But that's in the nature of revolutions. The center changes and the news spreads out. And once the edge has caught up, the center has already moved on to the next steps.

These fractally complex and fast developing attitudes and technologies reflect a maturation in how Industry 4.0 is viewed — transitioning from a hyped and idealized vision of rapid transformation to a more nuanced and hard-fought understanding that emphasizes the complexity, the gradual nature of adoption, and the need for strategic planning and investment.

Forward to Industry 4.1, where we leave BETA and the work really begins.

And next? Predicting the nature of Industry 5.0 is a hard game to play. Extrapolating the 3 nm gallium arsenide wafer from the vacuum tube diode wasn't possible, other than in the vague descriptors of smaller-faster-cheaper. Paradigm shifts shift the paradigm.

Will Industry 5.0 integrate the machine with the wet-ware at a biological level? There are signs that the man-machine interface is on the edge of this. And the impacts would be a revolution indeed.

Will the singularity happen, making the difference between man and machine essentially irrelevant?

Will we (the species OR the individual) avoid toxic or violent extinction long enough to see a sustainable future?

Will our robot overlords simply outpace their makers and make us a redundant anachronism?

Living long enough to see Industry 4.1 widely implemented is challenging. Seeing release 4.9 so it's practical to extrapolate what Industry 5.0 looks like is too big a jump for this mortal spanner wielder.

But it's reasonable to have confidence that it'll not be boring.

About the author

Jon Lowy is a U.K. engineering graduate with a U.K. postgrad teaching qualification and a New Zealand masters in material science. He’s spent 40 years in a spectrum of technical roles across design, R&D leadership, making (and breaking) patents, business development, manufacturing, oil/gas field engineering and high school STEM teaching. Lowy has been writing professionally for three years, with works published across various digital platforms.